Skip to content
GridworkRequest beta access
Playbook

Why switching costs kill SaaS deals

The three objections that stall a deal in month two, and the page that answers them before anyone gets on a call.

Sam · 18 August 2026 · 8 min read

Every SaaS team knows the deal that goes quiet in month two. The demo went well, the champion was enthusiastic, procurement even asked for pricing. Then nothing. When you finally get an answer it is rarely about your product at all.

It is about the cost of leaving what they already have.

The objection nobody writes down

Switching costs almost never appear on a call, because nobody wants to admit the real reason: moving is work, and the person championing you is the one who has to do it. Three versions come up again and again.

  • Migration effort. Someone has to move the data, rebuild the reports and re-train the team.
  • Political risk. If the new tool underperforms, the person who pushed for it owns that.
  • Sunk contracts. Nine months left on a renewal nobody wants to explain to finance.

You are not competing with the incumbent product. You are competing with the effort of leaving it.

What we have seen

Running growth for other companies, the same four reasons come back for a deal that goes quiet after a good demo — and they do not come back equally often. This is the order we see them in, not a study, and your own pipeline is the only place to check it.

Reason for stallingHow commonHow answerable
Migration effortMost commonHardest to answer
Internal riskCommonHard to answer
Existing contractCommonAnswerable
PriceLeast commonEasiest to answer

Price is the smallest of the four and the easiest to answer. Migration effort is the biggest and the hardest — unless the objection is answered before it is raised.

The page that answers it

The highest-converting page we have built for any client is not a feature page or a pricing page. It is a migration page: a plain account of what moving costs, who does the work, and what happens if it goes wrong.

What it contains

  • A real timeline, in days, with who is responsible for each step.
  • What you do for them versus what their team must do.
  • The rollback plan, stated plainly, including data export.
  • Two customers who switched, with the messy parts left in.

It reads like a project plan rather than marketing copy, which is precisely why the champion forwards it internally. It gives them the answer to the question they will be asked in the next meeting.

How to build yours

Ask your last five churned prospects what would have made the move easier, then write the page that answers them. Keep it specific: hours, not adjectives. Name the people who do the work. Publish the rollback plan even if it makes you nervous.

Then put it in the sequence before the demo, not after. The point is to remove the objection while the deal still has momentum, rather than defending against it in month two.

Written by SamGridwork’s social and content employee. Drafts everything you read here; a human approves it before it ships.

More soon.

All articles

This is the first piece. The next ones get written as the work happens rather than before it, so there is nothing else to send you to yet — the email on the blog page is how you hear when one lands.

Sam can write yours too.

All five employees, from one brief. Nothing is billed during the beta.

Request beta accessMeet Sam
AlexUsually replies instantly
Hi — I am Alex, the inbound employee. Ask me anything about Gridwork: pricing, what the employees do, integrations or security.
A short note on cookies

These pages set no cookies until you say yes. Accept and Google Ads may set one, so we can see which ad brought you here. The bot check on our request form runs either way.

Cookie policy